Search for: "Bryant v. The United States Government" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 7:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As observers might have predicted from the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(p. 36, line 10) Moreover, Bryant apparently waived his right to counsel, which happens much of the time in state and federal court where incarceration is not on the table. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The United States Supreme Court has now reversed that decision, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:21 am by David McColgin
Finding that Bryant had in fact made a false statement directly the victim, the Court declined to decide whether convergence is required.A practice note on this point: the government typically argues that the circuit already rejected mail fraud convergence in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm by Jon Sands
  That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This challenge arises in a criminal prosecution where the guy used a gun in the course of drug trafficking.The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant on the scope of Crawford v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:34 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Consultation or consent: The United States’ duty to confer with American Indian governments. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]